¡@

Home 

c++ Programming Glossary: rhs

What is the difference between a definition and a declaration?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1410563/what-is-the-difference-between-a-definition-and-a-declaration

to the above declarations int bar int g int lhs int rhs return lhs rhs double f int i double d return i d class foo.. declarations int bar int g int lhs int rhs return lhs rhs double f int i double d return i d class foo A definition can..

What are Aggregates and PODs and how/why are they special?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4178175/what-are-aggregates-and-pods-and-how-why-are-they-special

ok public member Aggregate1 operator Aggregate1 const rhs ok copy assignment private void f ok just a private function..

Operator overloading

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4421706/operator-overloading

perfect assignment operator for reference X X operator X rhs swap rhs return this Input and Output Operators The stream operators.. assignment operator for reference X X operator X rhs swap rhs return this Input and Output Operators The stream operators.. them is this inline bool operator const X lhs const X rhs do actual comparison inline bool operator const X lhs const..

How to verify algebraic statements using boost::spirit?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15123412/how-to-verify-algebraic-statements-using-boostspirit

to evaluate the left hand side LHS and the right hand side RHS of the statement individually before finally performing a comparison.. would be to construct two separate parsers one LHS and one RHS separated by a third parser matching the equality sign. The.. parser matching the equality sign. The two parsers LHS and RHS should be identical except for the semantic action which clearly..

Struct initialization of the C/C++ programming language?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1705147/struct-initialization-of-the-c-c-programming-language

similar it is an assign expression. It means that the RHS of the equals operator is an expression that is evaluated independently.. struct struct_type_id value1 value2 value3 Now the RHS of the equals operator is a valid expression since there is..

Why copy constructor is not called in this case?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1758142/why-copy-constructor-is-not-called-in-this-case

A 5 I assumed that output would be Regular Constructor for RHS followed by Copy constructor for LHS. So I avoided this style..

what does malloc(0) return?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2132273/what-does-malloc0-return

case let's assume that both the malloc 0 on the LHS and RHS returns non NULL . Then they are guaranteed to be different...

Unsequenced value computations (a.k.a sequence points)

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3852768/unsequenced-value-computations-a-k-a-sequence-points

x 1 1 . So let's interpret that. Evaluate the 1 on the far RHS and descend into the parens. Evaluate the inner 1 and the value..

Correct implementation of min

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4174447/correct-implementation-of-min

far Recommended implementation template class LHS class RHS class Return inline Return min LHS lhs RHS rhs return rhs lhs.. class LHS class RHS class Return inline Return min LHS lhs RHS rhs return rhs lhs rhs lhs Other possible implementation template.. lhs Other possible implementation template class LHS class RHS class Return inline Return min LHS lhs RHS rhs return lhs rhs..

Construct object with itself as reference?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4368361/construct-object-with-itself-as-reference

immediately after the identifier. In the case int i i the RHS i is after the LHS i so i is in scope. This is not always bad..

Legality of using operator delete on a pointer obtained from placement new

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4418220/legality-of-using-operator-delete-on-a-pointer-obtained-from-placement-new

sizeof X X p new raw X according to the standard the RHS is a placement new expression operator delete p definitely wrong.. sizeof X X p new raw X 1 according to the standard the RHS is a placement new expression operator delete p definitely wrong..

How to implement folding with variadic templates

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6065810/how-to-implement-folding-with-variadic-templates

This works as expected struct adder template int LHS int RHS std integral_constant int LHS RHS operator std integral_constant.. template int LHS int RHS std integral_constant int LHS RHS operator std integral_constant int LHS std integral_constant.. std integral_constant int LHS std integral_constant int RHS return auto result foldl adder std integral_constant int 19..

virtual assignment operator C++

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/669818/virtual-assignment-operator-c

there is then a risk that your LHS is a Derived and the RHS is a Base so when the virtual operator runs in Derived your..

Non-pointer typedef of member functions not allowed?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7429510/non-pointer-typedef-of-member-functions-not-allowed

Conclusion As we know that we cannot write X a on the RHS no matter if a is a member data or member function. The only..