¡@

Home 

c++ Programming Glossary: safer

Bitfield manipulation in C

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1044654/bitfield-manipulation-in-c

is worth the extra few lines to make it portable and safer. Is there any more arguments for either side In particular is..

What is std::promise?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11004273/what-is-stdpromise

or std bind and a std promise and a std thread but it's safer and easier to use std async . std promise is a bit lower level..

Use of 'const' for function parameters

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/117293/use-of-const-for-function-parameters

copied objects it doesn't really matter although it can be safer as it signals intent within the function. Its really a judgement..

Very poor boost::lexical_cast performance

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1250795/very-poor-boostlexical-cast-performance

And with some work it could probably go faster and safer if we had direct write access to the std string internal buffer..

Sell me on const correctness

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/136880/sell-me-on-const-correctness

consistently but the end code is more concise and safer to program with. When you do a lot of C development the benefits..

C++ stringstream, string, and char* conversion confusion

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1374468/c-stringstream-string-and-char-conversion-confusion

re allocate and thus render cstr invalid. It is therefor safer to not to store the result of at all and use cstr only until..

Variable number of arguments in C++?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1657883/variable-number-of-arguments-in-c

shouldn't and you can probably do what you want to do in a safer and simpler way. Technically to use variable number of arguments.. in streams or default arguments etc. These are all safer the compiler gets to know more about what you're trying to do..

Is it good practice to NULL a pointer after deleting it?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1931126/is-it-good-practice-to-null-a-pointer-after-deleting-it

case wrapping it in a RAII object would have been much safer and cleaner. End the RAII object's scope when you no longer..

Is it okay to inherit implementation from STL containers, rather than delegate?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2034916/is-it-okay-to-inherit-implementation-from-stl-containers-rather-than-delegate

implementation in such cases What are the risks Is there a safer way I can implement this without so much typing Am I a heretic..

Why don't C++ compilers define operator== and operator!=?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/217911/why-dont-c-compilers-define-operator-and-operator

a pointer comparison or a deep internal comparison. It's safer to just not implement it and let the programmer do that themselves...

C++ format macro / inline ostringstream

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/303562/c-format-macro-inline-ostringstream

could just use ostringstream . But a dynamic_cast would be safer. In the unlikely event dynamic_cast returned NULL it shouldn't..

Singleton instance declared as static variable of GetInstance method

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/449436/singleton-instance-declared-as-static-variable-of-getinstance-method

when GetInstance called for the first time. The code is safer because there is no other way to get reference to instance but..

How to implement the factory pattern in C++ correctly

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5120768/how-to-implement-the-factory-pattern-in-c-correctly

if it exists it is in valid state I feel that my code is safer and less error prone. I like it that way. Having to drop that..

Type erasure techniques

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5450159/type-erasure-techniques

as an answer or just edit the question I'll just do the safer one. Another nice technique to hide the actual type of something..

What are the differences between pointer variable and reference variable in C++?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/57483/what-are-the-differences-between-pointer-variable-and-reference-variable-in-c

12 illegal to dereference a temporary. This makes const safer for use in argument lists and so forth. share improve this..

Differences between unique_ptr and shared_ptr [duplicate]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6876751/differences-between-unique-ptr-and-shared-ptr

resource. In this way you can think of unique_ptr as a safer better replacement for auto_ptr . shared_ptr on the other hand..

Is there any reason to use C instead of C++ for embedded development?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/812717/is-there-any-reason-to-use-c-instead-of-c-for-embedded-development

as I prefixes clutter the code. I see C a bit type safer mainly because of templates and verbose casting. I really like..

Why is reading lines from stdin much slower in C++ than Python?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9371238/why-is-reading-lines-from-stdin-much-slower-in-c-than-python

buffer overflow. So I wrote this iteration using fgets the safer alternative to gets. Here are the pertinent lines for my fellow..

When are C++ macros beneficial?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/96196/when-are-c-macros-beneficial

In lined functions consts and templates are usually a safer and superior alternative to a #define . The following macro..