”@
c++ Programming Glossary: unambiguousIs any part of C++ syntax context sensitive? [duplicate] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1172939/is-any-part-of-c-syntax-context-sensitive a language. Even if a language can be proven to have no unambiguous grammars if it can be recognized by a context free grammar it's..
Is C++ context-free or context-sensitive? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14589346/is-c-context-free-or-context-sensitive a language. Even if a language can be proven to have no unambiguous grammars if it can be recognized by a context free grammar it's..
Why isn't C/C++'s “#pragma once” an ISO standard? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1695807/why-isnt-c-cs-pragma-once-an-iso-standard to define in a fully portable way that has clear an unambiguous benefits. Some of the concepts for which it raises questions..
Can you catch an exception by the type of a conversion operator? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2343208/can-you-catch-an-exception-by-the-type-of-a-conversion-operator or the handler is of type cv T or cv T and T is an unambiguous public base class of E or the handler is of type cv1 T cv2 and..
Multiple Inheritance from two derived classes http://stackoverflow.com/questions/254673/multiple-inheritance-from-two-derived-classes This should make the methods from the base class unambiguous again. However note if there is additional data in the two intermediate..
Method resolution order in C++ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3310910/method-resolution-order-in-c 10.2 . Basically it will find the closest unambiguous implementation in the superclass graph. The algorithm works..
Copy Constructor not called by synthesized property setter in Objective C++ code http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3642979/copy-constructor-not-called-by-synthesized-property-setter-in-objective-c-code on this but I'm also finding it hard to find suitable unambiguous search terms. So Stackoverflow to the rescue I hope I have a..
Use of typename keyword with template function parameters http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4347730/use-of-typename-keyword-with-template-function-parameters story template class T void foo T type v That isn't unambiguous anymore. It could declare a variable of type void that is initialized.. The appearance of a single const syntactically makes it unambiguous but it's too much context dependence to make this work in a.. Not even the appearance of const in there provides for a unambiguous parse. Should it be a function declaration with an unnamed parameter..
Use of typename keyword with typedef and new http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4421306/use-of-typename-keyword-with-typedef-and-new want to discuss other two contexts which seem to be unambiguous but we're still required to write typename typedef typename.. why do compilers still need the typename keyword even in unambiguous situations such as when we use typedef and new EDIT after reading.. I tend to agree with you here. Syntactically it should be unambiguous if you leave off parentheses. As I've never written a C parser..
What type should I catch if I throw a string literal? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4831523/what-type-should-i-catch-if-i-throw-a-string-literal or the handler is of type cv T or cv T and T is an unambiguous public base class of E or the handler is of type cv1 T cv2 and..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5854581/polymorphism-in-c mutual understanding for your audience consider... using unambiguous terminology can we make this code reusable for other types or..
Dynamic downcast on private inheritance within private scope http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6927895/dynamic-downcast-on-private-inheritance-within-private-scope bla bla about cv1 and cv2 ... and B shall be an accessible unambiguous base class of D emphasis mine recall 11.2 A base class is said.. the most derived object has a base class of type T that is unambiguous and public the result is a pointer an lvalue referring to the..
Extracting the return type from an overloaded function http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7260561/extracting-the-return-type-from-an-overloaded-function given that extraction of function pointer type works for unambiguous functions. #include iostream using namespace std #define resultof..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/867462/c-implicit-conversions 2 User defined conversions are applied only where they are unambiguous 10.2 12.3.2 . Conversions obey the access control rules Clause..
Members vs method arguments access in C++ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/885136/members-vs-method-arguments-access-in-c which is still a bit funny to read out loud but is fairly unambiguous on the screen. If you absolutely need to have the variables..
|