c++ Programming Glossary: vla

Undocumented GCC Extension: VLA in struct

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12058760/undocumented-gcc-extension-vla-in-struct

GCC Extension VLA in struct While reading the Clang documentation I came across..

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1887097/variable-length-arrays-in-c

was a discussion about this kicked off in usenet Why no VLAs in C 0x . I agree with those people that seem to agree that.. know the size beforehand you will write unsafe code. C99 VLAs could provide a small benefit of being able to create small.. problem because a vector is a resizable container whereas VLAs are fixed size. The C Dynamic Array proposal is intended to..

c++ Initializing a struct with an array as a member

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2650374/c-initializing-a-struct-with-an-array-as-a-member

entries. EDIT I think but am not sure that this is not a VLA issue. To clarify I'm trying to get the compiler to do the work..

Relationship between C and C++

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4388606/relationship-between-c-and-c

hearing that C99 supports many things that C doesn't like VLA and that there is even going to be C1x or C0x whatever it's..

Is there const in C?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5248571/is-there-const-in-c

case label as a bit field width or as array size in a non VLA array declaration all this is possible in C . Also const objects..

Non-const declaration of array

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5377411/non-const-declaration-of-array

gcc share improve this question This is a C99 feature VLA which is not a part of standard c . You can use it if your compiler..

When are Variable-length arrays legal?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5730101/when-are-variable-length-arrays-legal

variable and type supports compile time sizeof operator. VLA support requires that compilers can generate code where offsets.. No longer can the sizes be calculated on compile time. VLA support as specified in the C standard has big problems you.. in the C standard has big problems you cannot put VLA inside a struct or class VLA's are basically restricted to the..

In C++ books, array bound must be constant expression, but why the following code works?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5947661/in-c-books-array-bound-must-be-constant-expression-but-why-the-following-cod

share improve this question This a a C99 feature called VLA which some compilers also allow in C . It's allocation on stack..

Why doesn't C++ support dynamic arrays on the stack? [closed]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7458857/why-doesnt-c-support-dynamic-arrays-on-the-stack

these solutions C99 came up with Variable Length Array VLA . It has the same problem as regular arrays it decays into pointer.. Weimer asked here at comp.std.c that if C 0x allows VLA then what would the following code mean int vla n n is known..

How do compilers treat variable length arrays

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7627235/how-do-compilers-treat-variable-length-arrays

C99 since G supports C99 it's easy enough to apply the VLA support to C as an extension. As to how the compiler usually.. as an extension. As to how the compiler usually implements VLAs it's the same as alloca except that it has to keep the size..

can we give size of static array a variable

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7696591/can-we-give-size-of-static-array-a-variable

question What you have is called a variable length array VLA and it is not part of C although it is part of C99. Many compilers.. as an extension. Even the very new C 11 doesn't include VLAs as the entire concept doesn't fit well into the advanced type..

What happens if I define a 0-size array in C/C++?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9722632/what-happens-if-i-define-a-0-size-array-in-c-c

The above text is true both for a plain array 禮1 and a VLA 禮5 . This is normative text in the C standard. A compiler is..