¡@

Home 

2014/10/15 ¤U¤È 10:03:29

iphone Programming Glossary: abuse

Send mail without MFMailComposeViewController

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1263412/send-mail-without-mfmailcomposeviewcontroller

supported by the iPhone SDK probably because Apple doesn't want you to do it. Why not My guess Because it's easy to abuse. If we knew user's email address we could spam them we could fake emails from them etc. Imagine finding out an iPhone app..

Security When Using REST API in an iPhone Application

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15273705/security-when-using-rest-api-in-an-iphone-application

which means that I can't detect on the server side that it didn't come from my application People being able to abuse the additional scopes that my client ID will allow them to have and traditional API users will not have My guess is that.. If you are serving an internal organization it may not be a big deal at all. If you can't afford a single abuse then you need to reconsider your design because this one isn't going to work. You simply cannot trust code that you don't..

OAuth secrets in mobile apps

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1934187/oauth-secrets-in-mobile-apps

a desktop app for that matter Storing the string in the app is obviously not good as someone could easily find it and abuse it. Another approach would be to store it on your server and have the app fetch it on every run never storing it on the..

iPhone - Backgrounding to poll for events

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4656214/iphone-backgrounding-to-poll-for-events

features the app will be launched by iOS in background again once it was quit by the system . This we will abuse later. In my case I used VoIP backgrounding enabled in my plist. All the code here is done in your AppDelegate if the iOS..

Using NSMutableDictionary as backing store for properties

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5873776/using-nsmutabledictionary-as-backing-store-for-properties

access syntax to access known formal properties. What you're doing while I found it fun to solve is technically an abuse of the property access syntax. This will only work for object values. KVC does the boxing and unboxing for primitive values..