¡@
python Programming Glossary: saferhttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/1087255/use-of-eval-in-python I'd reach for the ast module ast.literal_eval is MUCH safer than eval you can call it directly on a string form of the expression.. is just as simple as eval for the simplest cases but safer and preferable in production quality code. For many tasks I've..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1190206/threading-in-python to pickle variables and send them back and forth. This is safer but harder. If it matters increasingly the Python developers..
Is a string formatter that pulls variables from its calling scope bad practice? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13312240/is-a-string-formatter-that-pulls-variables-from-its-calling-scope-bad-practice y z python share improve this question A simpler and safer approach would be the code below. inspect.currentframe isn't..
Comparison of Python modes for Emacs http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15670505/comparison-of-python-modes-for-emacs and python mode .el version. So probably python.el is safer in this manner. But if you want better solution use EIN completion..
How do I force Python to be 32-bit on Snow Leopard and other 32-bit/64-bit questions http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2088569/how-do-i-force-python-to-be-32-bit-on-snow-leopard-and-other-32-bit-64-bit-quest alone is an acceptable strategy to you it's definitely safer than altering system files As for your third question hmmm this..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2153295/python-object-conversion and replacing its __dict__ as BrainCore posted would be safer but this code does what you asked with no new object being created...
Evaluating a mathematical expression in a string http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2371436/evaluating-a-mathematical-expression-in-a-string around this but isn't there a better and more importantly safer method to evaluate a mathematical expression that is being stored..
sandbox to execute possibly unfriendly python code [duplicate] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3910223/sandbox-to-execute-possibly-unfriendly-python-code
Process escape sequences in a string in Python http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4020539/process-escape-sequences-in-a-string-in-python
Getting data from ctypes array into numpy http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4355524/getting-data-from-ctypes-array-into-numpy to avoid this kind of construct. It is so much easier and safer to create arrays in the Python code and pass them to the C function..
Python “safe” eval (string to bool/int/float/None/string) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4388626/python-safe-eval-string-to-bool-int-float-none-string into Python values. I use a function that is kind of a safer version of eval except that if it can't read the string it stays..
Dynamic/runtime method creation (code generation) in Python http://stackoverflow.com/questions/533382/dynamic-runtime-method-creation-code-generation-in-python print v.dynamo 10 print v.dynamo.__doc__ Is there a better safer more idiomatic way of achieving the same result python metaprogramming..
Django or Ruby on Rails [closed] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/732476/django-or-ruby-on-rails community seems to be much bigger which might make it a safer bet. Do you think this is important Anybody have experience..
Python name mangling: When in doubt, do what? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7456807/python-name-mangling-when-in-doubt-do-what is that this will reduce dependencies and make the code safer to alter. The Python way of doing things in reverse starting..
Is it ever useful to use Python's input over raw_input? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7709022/is-it-ever-useful-to-use-pythons-input-over-raw-input and what would this ever be useful for that it wouldn't be safer to do with raw_input I understand that this has been changed..
How do I check if a file exists using Python? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/82831/how-do-i-check-if-a-file-exists-using-python this question Just to add to the answers it's usually safer to use the following approach try with open 'filename' process..
Why is reading lines from stdin much slower in C++ than Python? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9371238/why-is-reading-lines-from-stdin-much-slower-in-c-than-python buffer overflow. So I wrote this iteration using fgets the safer alternative to gets. Here are the pertinent lines for my fellow..
Converting a String to Dictionary? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/988228/converting-a-string-to-dictionary 'lolz' 'foo' 'kitty' 'muffin' 'lolz' 'foo' 'kitty' This is safer than using eval . As its own docs say help ast.literal_eval..
|