¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: convertiblehttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/1282295/what-exactly-is-nullptr nullptr. It is of type nullptr_t which is implicitly convertible and comparable to any pointer type or pointer to member type... type or pointer to member type. It is not implicitly convertible or comparable to integral types except for bool. How is it a..
How do conversion operators work in C++? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1307876/how-do-conversion-operators-work-in-c be very cautious about them. The following makes a type convertible to any pointer type member pointers aren't seen as pointer types..
Converting multidimensional arrays to pointers in c++ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1584100/converting-multidimensional-arrays-to-pointers-in-c way to do specifically that. A double 4 4 array is not convertible to a double pointer. These are two alternative incompatible..
Why is the same value output for A[0], &A, and *A? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17623556/why-is-the-same-value-output-for-a0-a-and-a decay into a int that refers to A 0 0 and that is itself convertible to a void . int 5 5 is a pointer and thus convertible to void.. convertible to a void . int 5 5 is a pointer and thus convertible to void so that overload is valid for both cases. The language..
How to implement big int in C++ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/269268/how-to-implement-big-int-in-c Figure out what types classes your big int class should be convertible to and how to properly handle the conversion. A quick list would..
How to pass a multidimensional array to a function in C and C++ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2828648/how-to-pass-a-multidimensional-array-to-a-function-in-c-and-c work in neither C nor C . An array of type int 4 4 is not convertible to a pointer of type int which is what int arr stands for in..
Forwarding all constructors in C++0x http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3119929/forwarding-all-constructors-in-c0x badly in overload resolution. Imagine your base class is convertible from int and there exist two functions to print out classes..
Why don't the std::fstream classes take a std::string? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/32332/why-dont-the-stdfstream-classes-take-a-stdstring lead to problems. For example suppose std string would be convertible to a C string so that you could use std string s with fstream.. string s with fstream s. Suppose also that C string are convertible to std string s as is the state in the current standard. Now..
Trouble with inheritance of operator= in C++ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3882186/trouble-with-inheritance-of-operator-in-c all other candidates are hidden. And since c is not convertible to B the above assignment does not compile. If you want your..
Will a “variableName;” C++ statement be a no-op at all times? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4030959/will-a-variablename-c-statement-be-a-no-op-at-all-times like last time worse actually in that x needs to be be convertible to int . This is again trivial to fix #define USE x void true.. void operator const foo int foo f USE f oops void isn't convertible to int That is if the type of the expression x overloads the.. expression x overloads the comma operator to something not convertible to int the solution fails. Sure unlikely but for the sake of..
C++ virtual function return type http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4665117/c-virtual-function-return-type even if it returns a Derived this pointer is implicitly convertible to a Base and the operation is well defined. More generally..
What does T&& (double ampersand) mean in C++11? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5481539/what-does-t-double-ampersand-mean-in-c11 f 0f int i f is well formed because float is implicitly convertible to int the reference would be to a temporary that is the result..
Portability of Native C++ properties http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5772480/portability-of-native-c-properties you are assigning values of type T here int or implicitly convertible to T to properties and as long you are converting them back..
Why do all these crazy function pointer definitions all work? What is really going on? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6893285/why-do-all-these-crazy-function-pointer-definitions-all-work-what-is-really-goi of these work is that a function like foo is implicitly convertible to a pointer to the function. This is why void p1_foo foo works..
What can and can't I specialize in the std namespace? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8513417/what-can-and-cant-i-specialize-in-the-std-namespace CopyAssignable and LessThanComparable and convertible to bool . Specializations of weak_ptr shall be CopyConstructible..
|