¡@

Home 

c++ Programming Glossary: mental

What is exactly the “immediate context” mentioned in the C++11 Standard for which SFINAE applies?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15260685/what-is-exactly-the-immediate-context-mentioned-in-the-c11-standard-for-whic

that's not an error just a deduction failure. So the mental model I use is that substitution needs to do a preparation step..

What's the difference between a derived object and a base object in c++?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1697020/whats-the-difference-between-a-derived-object-and-a-base-object-in-c

much about vtables but it's definitely useful to get your mental model of what is going on to make sense and not store up any..

Undefined, unspecified and implementation-defined behavior

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2397984/undefined-unspecified-and-implementation-defined-behavior

not matter what the correct behavior is according to your mental model of the language. If the C standard says it's undefined..

Pthreads in Visual C++

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2403536/pthreads-in-visual-c

directly. You can still learn how threads work and form a mental model of things. It just tends to use synchronization primitives..

Declaring pointers; asterisk on the left or right of the space between the type and name? [duplicate]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2660633/declaring-pointers-asterisk-on-the-left-or-right-of-the-space-between-the-type

the same thing but it depends on if a given programmer's mental model when creating a pointer is focused so to speak on the..

Confused about std::runtime_error vs. std::logic_error

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2924058/confused-about-stdruntime-error-vs-stdlogic-error

used as a means of parsing end user input so under my mental model it certainly should throw a runtime_error in the case..

How operator new calls the constructor of class?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2941888/how-operator-new-calls-the-constructor-of-class

How to get your head around C++ linking/dependencies?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3482894/how-to-get-your-head-around-c-linking-dependencies

simplicity and it works on all major platforms. As to your mental model of what's going on here are some points to keep in mind...

How to understand the design and code flow of any product quickly? [closed]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3586410/how-to-understand-the-design-and-code-flow-of-any-product-quickly

misuse the program While I'm doing that I'm constructing a mental model of how I would have implemented it. Surprisingly this..

Qt, MSVC, and /Zc:wchar_t- == I want to blow up the world

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4521252/qt-msvc-and-zcwchar-t-i-want-to-blow-up-the-world

to build with Zc wchar_t and will THAT cause permanent mental damage Can I get away with just using the standard 8 bit well..

When does postincrement i++ get executed? [duplicate]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5433852/when-does-postincrement-i-get-executed

to two separate instructions from here on is just a mental picture a similar to __tmp a a __tmp ignoring the added sequence..

Convienient C++ struct initialisation

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6181715/convienient-c-struct-initialisation

explanation why I should not want to do this i.e. why my mental paradigm is bad . EDIT By convenient I mean also maintainable..

Is #pragma once a safe include guard?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/787533/is-pragma-once-a-safe-include-guard

HEADER_H Should I be concerned Should I expend any further mental energy on this c include guards share improve this question..

const char* and char const* - are they the same?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8091770/const-char-and-char-const-are-they-the-same

at the beginning of a declaration is just a convenient mental shortcut. So the following two statements are equivalent char..

Why aren't copy constructors “chained” like default constructors or destructors?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8773048/why-arent-copy-constructors-chained-like-default-constructors-or-destructors

access basedata to change it. Is there something fundamental I'm missing about copy constructors so that my mental model.. fundamental I'm missing about copy constructors so that my mental model is incorrect or is there some arcane or not arcane reason..

With explicitly deleted member functions in C++11, is it still worthwhile to inherit from a noncopyable base class?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9458741/with-explicitly-deleted-member-functions-in-c11-is-it-still-worthwhile-to-inh