c++ Programming Glossary: unsequenced

In which versions of the C++ standard does “(i+=10)+=10” have undefined behaviour?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10655290/in-which-versions-of-the-c-standard-does-i-10-10-have-undefined-behaviou

and of subexpressions of individual expressions are unsequenced. ... If a side effect on a scalar object is unsequenced relative.. unsequenced. ... If a side effect on a scalar object is unsequenced relative to either another side effect on the same scalar object..

Is this undefined behavior or implementation defined?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11657100/is-this-undefined-behavior-or-implementation-defined

in C . C 11 1.9p15 If a side effect on a scalar object is unsequenced relative to either another side effect on the same scalar object.. in C 11 C11 6.5p2 If a side effect on a scalar object is unsequenced relative to either a different side effect on the same scalar..

Are multiple mutations within initializer lists undefined behavior?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14442894/are-multiple-mutations-within-initializer-lists-undefined-behavior

and of subexpressions of individual expressions are unsequenced. ... When calling a function whether or not the function is..

Are multiple mutations of the same variable within initializer lists undefined behavior pre C++11

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19881803/are-multiple-mutations-of-the-same-variable-within-initializer-lists-undefined-b

the following warning live example warning multiple unsequenced modifications to 'count' Wunsequenced int arrInt 2 count count.. warning multiple unsequenced modifications to 'count' Wunsequenced int arrInt 2 count count ^ ~~ I am not advocating for code..

The result of int c=0; cout<<c++<<c;

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2603312/the-result-of-int-c-0-coutcc

and of subexpressions of individual expressions are unsequenced It also includes the following code block i v i the behavior..

Unsequenced value computations (a.k.a sequence points)

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3852768/unsequenced-value-computations-a-k-a-sequence-points

effects. 1.9 15 If a side effect on a scalar object is unsequenced relative to either another side effect on the same scalar object.. effects associated with different argument expressions are unsequenced. 𤫟nd note 3.9 9 Arithmetic types 3.9.1 enumeration types pointer.. Expr1 the evaluation of the expression i first argument is unsequenced with respect to the evaluation of the expession operator i which..

Unexpected order of evaluation (compiler bug?) [duplicate]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5214611/unexpected-order-of-evaluation-compiler-bug

before B and B is not sequenced before A then A and B are unsequenced . Note The execution of unsequenced evaluations can overlap... A then A and B are unsequenced . Note The execution of unsequenced evaluations can overlap. end note Except where noted evaluations.. and of subexpressions of individual expressions are unsequenced. Note In an expression that is evaluated more than once during..

Is it legal to use the increment operator in a C++ function call?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/598148/is-it-legal-to-use-the-increment-operator-in-a-c-function-call

associated with the different argument expressions are unsequenced. So it would seem to me that this code foo i is perfectly legal... 1.9.16 also says If a side effect on a scalar object is unsequenced relative to either another side effect on the same scalar object..

order of evaluation of operands

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7112282/order-of-evaluation-of-operands

wording changes in the second one to say that the order is unsequenced rather than unspecified but it is essentially the same. I don't..