c++ Programming Glossary: upper_bound

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14493978/running-time-for-insertion-sort

for auto it first it last it auto const insertion std upper_bound first it it cmp std rotate insertion it std next it The algorithm..

Implementation of a “hits in last [second/minute/hour]” data structure

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18364490/implementation-of-a-hits-in-last-second-minute-hour-data-structure

second etc for Minute Hour void prune auto old upper_bound hits.begin . hits.end make_pair now 1 hour 1 if old hits.end..

stl::multimap - how do i get groups of data?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/247818/stlmultimap-how-do-i-get-groups-of-data

to access MultiMaps in such a way. I could use lower_bound upper_bound to manually iterate the multimap and total the group's contents..

How to convert a sorted std::list of std::pair to a std::map

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3412623/how-to-convert-a-sorted-stdlist-of-stdpair-to-a-stdmap

string double MyOwnBinaryPredicate with lower_bound and upper_bound would be more adequate. The fact is that I want to insert elements..

Where can I get a “useful” C++ binary search algorithm?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/446296/where-can-i-get-a-useful-c-binary-search-algorithm

binary search not just any search. so far lower_bound and upper_bound fail because if the datum is missing lousy pseudo code vector.. vector 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 0 notice no 5 iter lower_bound_or_upper_bound start end 5 iter 5 iter end not returning end as usual instead.. it'll return 4 or 6 Also I really doubt lower_bound and upper_bound are implemented as binary_searches because they work just as..

Returning the greatest key strictly less than the given key in a C++ Map

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/529831/returning-the-greatest-key-strictly-less-than-the-given-key-in-a-c-map

a way the C STL Maps support this since lower_bound and upper_bound on maps strictly return the value greater than the passed value... greatest key strictly less than given key i.e iterator map.upper_bound 2.3 and then iterator c stl share improve this question ..

Fast weighted random selection from very large set of values

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6052603/fast-weighted-random-selection-from-very-large-set-of-values

of the weights. Alternatively use a std map and the upper_bound method. #include iostream #include map #include stdlib.h int.. linear rand 1.0 RAND_MAX std cout linear t cumulative.upper_bound linear second std endl return 0 share improve this answer..

compare function for upper_bound / lower_bound

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/869593/compare-function-for-upper-bound-lower-bound

function for upper_bound lower_bound I want to find the first item in a sorted vector.. and 'float' float x std vector MyClass iterator last std upper_bound myClass.begin myClass.end x c algorithm stl share improve.. sort algorithm You should be able to use the same one for upper_bound and lower_bound. The easiest way to make the comparison work..

std::multimap is there an iterator across unique keys?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9371236/stdmultimap-is-there-an-iterator-across-unique-keys

c multimap share improve this question You can use upper_bound to increment the iterator position instead of #include map #include.. 3 angel for auto it mm.begin end mm.end it end it mm.upper_bound it first cout it first ' ' it second endl return 0 share improve..

How to make a fast search for an object with a particular value in a vector of structs or classes? c++

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9718341/how-to-make-a-fast-search-for-an-object-with-a-particular-value-in-a-vector-of-s

library algorithms like binary_search lower_bound or upper_bound . The above will give you a better compliexity than o n given..