¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: calleePassing a modifiable parameter to c++ function http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1322517/passing-a-modifiable-parameter-to-c-function therefore the value of your variable may be altered by the callee . I personally prefer a reference for the following reason I..
Weird MSC 8.0 error: “The value of ESP was not properly saved across a function call…” http://stackoverflow.com/questions/142644/weird-msc-8-0-error-the-value-of-esp-was-not-properly-saved-across-a-function #2 . 1 Mismatched calling conventions The caller and the callee do not have a proper agreement on who is going to do what. For.. and differently. 2 Mismatched types The caller and the callee are not compiled with the same types. For example a common header.. types may have a different size in the caller and in the callee. In that case the caller pushes the arguments of one size but..
Why are Cdecl calls often mismatched in the “standard” P/Invoke Convention? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15660722/why-are-cdecl-calls-often-mismatched-in-the-standard-p-invoke-convention only reason for existence is that it specifies that the callee cleans up. Which produces more compact code very important back.. assumes are the arguments for a function and what the callee implemented causes the stack to get imbalanced. Which in turn.. there can never be an incompatibility between caller and callee. Thus allowing the designers to take the advantages of all of..
Why wasn't yield added to C++0x? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3864410/why-wasnt-yield-added-to-c0x adequate substitute. They are not however for many reasons callee kept state non reentrant macro based that alone is reason enough..
Boost::Tuples vs Structs for return values http://stackoverflow.com/questions/409827/boosttuples-vs-structs-for-return-values are two sides. One is the call side and the other is the callee side int remainder int quotient tie quotient remainder div 10..
Pass by Reference / Value in C++ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/410593/pass-by-reference-value-in-c by reference means that the object can't be changed in the callee. Example struct Object int i void sample Object o 1 o i void.. object by reference . It denotes the object itself. The callee has got a reference parameter. sample oj_c also passes by reference..
In either C or C++, should I check pointer parameters against NULL/nullptr? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4390007/in-either-c-or-c-should-i-check-pointer-parameters-against-null-nullptr this answer . I've always been of the philosophy that the callee is never responsible when the caller does something stupid like.. function. I don't think it's the responsibility of the callee to deal with such things. However I know there are going to..
when do we need to pass the size of array as a parameter http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6638729/when-do-we-need-to-pass-the-size-of-array-as-a-parameter the above scheme works only if both the caller and the callee agree to a convention and follow it. An example is strlen function..
Implicit VS Explicit Conversion http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7099957/implicit-vs-explicit-conversion converting constructor the caller will use C strings the callee will receive its string object. Still in some cases one parameters..
When to use shared_ptr and when to use raw pointers? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7657718/when-to-use-shared-ptr-and-when-to-use-raw-pointers it and there is understanding between the caller and the callee that the former is now responsible for that data. c smart pointers..
C++: How do I decide if to pass params by ref or by value? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9442202/c-how-do-i-decide-if-to-pass-params-by-ref-or-by-value that it's breaking the contract between caller and callee. If you can live with that that's okay. I generally can't The..
|