¡@

Home 

c++ Programming Glossary: caller

How do malloc() and free() work?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1119134/how-do-malloc-and-free-work

it is just divided into two parts. One is returned to caller the other is put back into the free list. There are many different..

How to pass parameters correctly?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15600499/how-to-pass-parameters-correctly

modifications to that object will be visible to the caller then you should pass by lvalue reference void foo my_class obj..

how to use an iterator?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2712076/how-to-use-an-iterator

are taken by const references. This indicates to the caller that the function won't change the points it is passed. Then..

C++ Winsock P2P

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2843277/c-winsock-p2p

0 mySet NULL NULL zero if FD_ISSET s mySet you have a new caller sockaddr_in remote SOCKET newSocket accept s SOCKADDR remote..

Can we increase the re-usability of this key-oriented access-protection pattern?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3324898/can-we-increase-the-re-usability-of-this-key-oriented-access-protection-pattern

int main This method has two drawbacks 1 the caller has to know the specific passkey it needs to create. While a.. idiom for any combination of classes and functions. The caller doesn't need to try to create or remember a passkey specific.. definitions required this eliminates both drawbacks. The caller just creates its own passkey and calls with that and doesn't..

When and why will an OS initialise memory to 0xCD, 0xDD, etc. on malloc/free/new/delete?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/370195/when-and-why-will-an-os-initialise-memory-to-0xcd-0xdd-etc-on-malloc-free-new

would run past the end of the buffer for example if the caller passed in a buffer size that was too large to fread . In that..

RAII and smart pointers in C++

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/395123/raii-and-smart-pointers-in-c

deleted once we exit foo . In other words by the time the caller gets the pointer it's useless and arguably worse than useless.. want to make sure we delete it. We could just say that the caller must delete the object once he's finished with it. The downside.. once he's finished with it. The downside is that the caller has to manage memory which adds extra complexity and might get..

Pass by Reference / Value in C++

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/410593/pass-by-reference-value-in-c

a `Object `. Passes a pointer to the object by value. The caller can change the pointer the parameter but that won't change the..

make shared_ptr not use delete

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/441306/make-shared-ptr-not-use-delete

wrapper functor Doug T. description but without the custom caller. boost shared_ptr T ptr new T std mem_fun_ref T deleteMe boost..

How many and which are the uses of “const” in C++?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/455518/how-many-and-which-are-the-uses-of-const-in-c

not you need to copy. struct MyString char getData copy caller might write return mData char const getData const return mData..

Object destruction in C++

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6403055/object-destruction-in-c

are destructed before the exception is propagated to the caller. This process is called stack unwinding . During stack unwinding..

Why 'this' is a pointer and not a reference?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/645994/why-this-is-a-pointer-and-not-a-reference

prevents bugs and provides some level of guarantee to the caller that the object won't change. Doug T. Dec 22 '08 at 16 42 you..

Accessing class members on a NULL pointer

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/669742/accessing-class-members-on-a-null-pointer

Foo represented anywhere. To call a virtual function the caller needs to know which object the function is being called on... a pointer to a vtable a list of function pointers and the caller just knows it's supposed to call the first function on the list.. pointer points. But to call a non virtual function the caller doesn't need to know all that. The compiler knows exactly which..

Is pass-by-value a reasonable default in C++11?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7592630/is-pass-by-value-a-reasonable-default-in-c11

do this void foo T t ... which has the advantage that the caller can use foo like so T lval foo lval copy from lvalue foo T potential..

Storing boost::function objects in a container

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13094720/storing-boostfunction-objects-in-a-container

operator const KeyEvent cout func2 data data endl struct Caller template typename F void operator F f f 1 class Callbacks vector.. it v.end v.erase it void call_all for_each v.begin v.end Caller cout string 16 '_' endl int main int argc char argv Callbacks.. operator const KeyEvent cout func2 data data endl struct Caller template typename F void operator F f f 1 int main int argc..

c++ exception : throwing std::string

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/134569/c-exception-throwing-stdstring

throw new std String it's the end of the world void Foo Caller try this Bar should throw catch std String caught not quite..

Overriding “new” and Logging data about the caller

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1395202/overriding-new-and-logging-data-about-the-caller

b_MemProfStarted b_MemProfStarted false o_MemLogFile NEW Caller __FILE__ __LINE__ endl b_MemProfStarted true void p malloc..

C/C++ function definitions without assembly

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2442966/c-c-function-definitions-without-assembly

The relevant data from the table is File name write Caller i.e. Not Applicable Syscall name write Args Ci ibn Strong name..

Brute-force, single-threaded prime factorization

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3918968/brute-force-single-threaded-prime-factorization

__int64 ulong typedef std vector ulong ULongVector Caller needs to pass in an empty factors vector void GetFactors ULongVector..

Function pointer to class member function problems

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/439540/function-pointer-to-class-member-function-problems

this at runtime yet because it's a DLL and I have no Debug Caller Exe yet and there are other problems during initialization etc...

Is it safe to `delete this`?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/550189/is-it-safe-to-delete-this

accidentally access member variables after delete this . Caller code might not realize your object has self destructed. Also..