¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: disassemblyOptimisation of division in gcc http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1121791/optimisation-of-division-in-gcc real 0m0.655s user 0m0.327s sys 0m0.046s Examining the disassembly shows that in the fast const case the modulo has been turned..
Why is such complex code emitted for dividing a signed integer by a power of two? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12692111/why-is-such-complex-code-emitted-for-dividing-a-signed-integer-by-a-power-of-two code with VC 10 DWORD ran rand return ran 4096 I get this disassembly 299 300 DWORD ran rand 00403940 call dword ptr __imp__rand 4050C0h.. compile this code int ran rand return ran 4096 I get this disassembly 299 300 int ran rand 00403940 call dword ptr __imp__rand 4050C0h..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1553382/is-delete-equal-to-delete ptr will it lead to memory leak if not then why This is disassembly code generated by VS2005 delete ptr 0041351D mov eax dword ptr..
Unusual heap size limitations in VS2003 C++ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2469738/unusual-heap-size-limitations-in-vs2003-c that it's this function that's failing looking at the disassembly if size _HEAP_MAXREQ reveals the following 00401078 cmp dword..
Address of function is not actual code address http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2485336/address-of-function-is-not-actual-code-address printaddr 0x013C1429 Address 0x013C4F10 void print ... The disassembly of taking the function address is void printaddr const char..
Does C++ limit recursion depth? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2630054/does-c-limit-recursion-depth
Are all macros evil? [duplicate] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/319452/are-all-macros-evil call. Offhand I instructed them to simply examine the disassembly in the debugger to provide some more clues. To my surprise this..
5 years later, is there something better than the “Fastest Possible C++ Delegates”? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4298408/5-years-later-is-there-something-better-than-the-fastest-possible-c-delegate recent compiler to use the code. By inspection of the disassembly the compiler was able to optimize away the wrapper function..
How do I find how C++ compiler implements something except inspecting emitted machine code? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4332286/how-do-i-find-how-c-compiler-implements-something-except-inspecting-emitted-ma decided to do The only way I know is to inspect the disassembly . This works well for simple code but there're two drawbacks.. . What the compiler did is to produce machine code. The disassembly is simply a more readable form of the machine code but it can't..
Call function in c++ dll without header http://stackoverflow.com/questions/554551/call-function-in-c-dll-without-header out a C function signature by analysing beginnig of its disassembly. The function arguments will be on the stack and the function..
Can optimizations affect the ability to debug a VC++ app using its PDB? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/563000/can-optimizations-affect-the-ability-to-debug-a-vc-app-using-its-pdb possible. Often when debugging optimized code I use the disassembly view dissasembly never lies. This all applies to windbg since..
Protecting executable from reverse engineering? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6481668/protecting-executable-from-reverse-engineering I've been contemplating how to protect my C C code from disassembly and reverse engineering. Normally I would never condone this.. after actual function calls Code obfustication mangles the disassembly of the binary Write my own startup routines harder for debuggers.. Pointless dummy calls and trampolines tons of jumping in disassembly output Tons of casting for obfuscated disassembly I mean these..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/714692/alloca-implementation know how the standard version is implemented. Reading the disassembly from compilers doesn't help because they perform so many optimizations..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7344226/buffer-overflow-attack _TCHAR argv double a function1 test a return a Thanks to disassembly we know that a in function1 is allocated before where the function..
How can I see the Assembly code for a C++ Program? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/840321/how-can-i-see-the-assembly-code-for-a-c-program also show disassebly. Use disas command in GDB or the disassembly window of Visual Studio on Windows. share improve this answer..
Find a function by it signature in Windows DLL http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9644717/find-a-function-by-it-signature-in-windows-dll or shrunk. Let's take the example of MessageBoxA who's disassembly looks like this for me 765DEA11 8BFF MOV EDI EDI 765DEA13 55..
In which scenario it is useful to use Disassembly language while debugging http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1565567/in-which-scenario-it-is-useful-to-use-disassembly-language-while-debugging which scenario it is useful to use Disassembly language while debugging I have following basic questions When..
Symbol not found when using template defined in a library http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18543980/symbol-not-found-when-using-template-defined-in-a-library btw are the section number remember binaries can be HUGE. Disassembly running objdump proof.o S gives proof.o file format elf64 x86.. objdump proof.o S gives proof.o file format elf64 x86 64 Disassembly of section .text 0000000000000000 _Z21TrustMeCompilerIExistv..
Does the semantics of `std::memory_order_acquire` requires processor instructions on x86/x86_64? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18576986/does-the-semantics-of-stdmemory-order-acquire-requires-processor-instruction forum index.php topic 72.0 And this code Disassembly code confirms this for store MSVS2012 x86_64 std atomic int..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2528776/windows-c-is-it-possible-to-find-the-line-of-code-where-exception-was-thrown for the DLL base address. Add the offset. Debug Windows Disassembly and enter the calculated address in the Address field prefix..
How to obtain a pointer out of a C++ vtable? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5099967/how-to-obtain-a-pointer-out-of-a-c-vtable member f member On GCC x86 64 I get this assembly output Disassembly of section .text 0000000000000000 _Z3fooP3FooMS_FvvE 0 40 f6..
Does the evil cast get trumped by the evil compiler? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/712334/does-the-evil-cast-get-trumped-by-the-evil-compiler Indeed after searching for a while the Menu Debug Windows Disassembly had exactly the optimization that was described below. printf..
Why is one loop so much slower than two loops? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8547778/why-is-one-loop-so-much-slower-than-two-loops question at the bottom PS I am not sure if this helps Disassembly for the first loop basically looks like this this block is repeated..
G++ 4.6 -std=gnu++0x: Static Local Variable Constructor Call Timing and Thread Safety http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9533649/g-4-6-std-gnu0x-static-local-variable-constructor-call-timing-and-thread-s intel test.dump test.dump test.o file format elf64 x86 64 Disassembly of section .text 0000000000000000 _Z1av 0 55 push rbp 1 48.. 48 89 c7 mov rdi rax 8c e8 00 00 00 00 call 91 _Z1fv 0x71 Disassembly of section .text._ZN1XC2Ev 0000000000000000 _ZN1XC1Ev 0 55 ..
|