¡@

Home 

c++ Programming Glossary: unreasonable

Boost dependency for a C++ open source project?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/125597/boost-dependency-for-a-c-open-source-project

sized C project without dependencies is downright unreasonable. Developing this argument further the one C dependency apart.. Boost libraries. I know that they aren't but it's not an unreasonable presumption for a software to make. If a software can't even..

CUDA streams destruction and CudaDeviceReset

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16979982/cuda-streams-destruction-and-cudadevicereset

someone else could actual compile and run. I find it a bit unreasonable to expect others to make a effort to answer what are basically..

How to create a class to wrap GULT?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2129388/how-to-create-a-class-to-wrap-gult

that practically never returns so your program flow is unreasonable. You should move that call into a separate run method in your..

How do I call native C++ from C#?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2211867/how-do-i-call-native-c-from-c

Anything out there to help me out This doesn't seem unreasonable to me. EDIT Tried m3rLinEz solution but it's giving me a BadImageFormatException..

Is std::ifstream thread-safe & lock-free?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2754303/is-stdifstream-thread-safe-lock-free

you are using to be more specific but it's probably unreasonable to assume ifstream is either thread safe or lock free. If nothing.. there is no way all of that can be done atomicly it's unreasonable to assume much about istream 's thread safety characteristics...

template class: ctor against function -> new C++ standard

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2794369/template-class-ctor-against-function-new-c-standard

point2 double point3 double Dennis and Michael noticed the unreasonable foolishly implemented constructor. They were right I didn't..

Template specialization with float as non type

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3800867/template-specialization-with-float-as-non-type

the Standards Committee decided that this would be unreasonable. Shamelessly copied from here. Why template non type parameters..

Generating random integer from a range

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5008804/generating-random-integer-from-a-range

integer in given range including border values . I don't unreasonable quality randomness requirements I have four requirements I need..

Why is it undefined behavior to delete[] an array of derived objects via a base pointer?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6171814/why-is-it-undefined-behavior-to-delete-an-array-of-derived-objects-via-a-base

You certainly can't do p i for i 0 with it. So it's not unreasonable that delete p doesn't work. To sum up arrays already have plenty..