¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: vexingWhy does this call the default constructor? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11691021/why-does-this-call-the-default-constructor temporary instead of a variable declaration c syntax most vexing parse share improve this question nothing at all because..
What's the differences between Test t; and Test t();? if Test is a class [duplicate] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12686298/whats-the-differences-between-test-t-and-test-t-if-test-is-a-class must be some differences between the two ways. c most vexing parse share improve this question Test t defines a variable..
Most vexing parse: why doesn't A a(()); work? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1424510/most-vexing-parse-why-doesnt-a-a-work vexing parse why doesn't A a work Among the many things Stack Overflow.. Stack Overflow has taught me is what is known as the most vexing parse which is classically demonstrated with a line such as.. exception written into the standard Thanks. c most vexing parse share improve this question There is no enlightened..
Default constructor with empty brackets http://stackoverflow.com/questions/180172/default-constructor-with-empty-brackets a good reason this isn't allowed c constructor c faq most vexing parse share improve this question Most vexing parse This.. faq most vexing parse share improve this question Most vexing parse This is known as C 's most vexing parse . Basically anything.. question Most vexing parse This is known as C 's most vexing parse . Basically anything that can be interpreted by compiler..
Examples of good gotos in C or C++ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/245742/examples-of-good-gotos-in-c-or-c you the braces for free either and omitting them can cause vexing bugs . Anyway I won't waste any more of your brain power on..
Read whole ASCII file into C++ std::string http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2602013/read-whole-ascii-file-into-c-stdstring are essential . They prevent the problem known as the most vexing parse which in this case won't actually give you a compile error..
Why is there no call to the constructor? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3810570/why-is-there-no-call-to-the-constructor the output. What is the problem c class constructor most vexing parse share improve this question Nope. Your line Class.. object Try it out. You may also be interested in the most vexing parse as others have noted . A great example is in Effective..
constructor invocation mechanism http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4283576/constructor-invocation-mechanism files for brevity. c constructor copy constructor most vexing parse share improve this question Case 1 m is interpreted.. use my m Case 2 This is something better known as the Most vexing parse . n is interpreted as a function returning my that takes..
Difference between creating object with () or without http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5116541/difference-between-creating-object-with-or-without My question What is the difference Regards Dirk c qt most vexing parse share improve this question The other answers correctly..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5926103/most-vexing-parsec vexing parse C I got the code from here . class Timer public Timer.. spot ambiguity on time_keeper Timer construction. c most vexing parse share improve this question This is due to the fact..
Is there a use for function declarations inside functions? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6089452/is-there-a-use-for-function-declarations-inside-functions although it gets much more press in C because of the most vexing parse . I suspect the answer in the context of C at least is..
Value-initializing an automatic object? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6298001/value-initializing-an-automatic-object initialization T var T extra parentheses avoid the most vexing parse For C 11 one can use uniform initialization syntax to..
Copy a streambuf's contents to a string http://stackoverflow.com/questions/877652/copy-a-streambufs-contents-to-a-string
|