¡@

Home 

c++ Programming Glossary: nonsense

Printing derived class name in base class

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10894683/printing-derived-class-name-in-base-class

class should appear fully it'll just be preceded with some nonsense namespaces and numbers essentially . share improve this answer..

Which I/O library do you use in your C++ code? [closed]

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/119098/which-i-o-library-do-you-use-in-your-c-code

double mean int sample_count int main X stats Plop 5.6 2 nonsense output just to exemplify stdio version fprintf stderr at p s..

templates problem ('typename' as not template function parameter)

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1600464/templates-problem-typename-as-not-template-function-parameter

a type and the definition of bar wrgl would be syntactic nonsense. Without knowing whether T wrgl refers to a type the compiler..

Why is passing a string literal into a char* argument only sometimes a compiler error?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2760500/why-is-passing-a-string-literal-into-a-char-argument-only-sometimes-a-compiler

D. The C 0x standard takes that deprecation further this nonsense rule is removed entirely from the upcoming standard. The const..

demote boost::function to a plain function pointer

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/282372/demote-boostfunction-to-a-plain-function-pointer

have bound it directly and skipped all of the function nonsense to begin with. If you think about it there isn't any magic solution..

Use of typename keyword with template function parameters

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4347730/use-of-typename-keyword-with-template-function-parameters

would be templated. Of course this semantically is all nonsense but it syntactically is alright. The appearance of a single.. the parameter in absence of a typename . That is totally nonsense too but is syntactically valid . In the case of base class names..

C-callback to function template: explicitly instantiate template

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6734492/c-callback-to-function-template-explicitly-instantiate-template

™t know the template arguments This question is obviously nonsense I can ™t. But is there a sneaky way around this Barring that..

How does Excel successfully Rounds Floating numbers even though they are imprecise?

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6930786/how-does-excel-successfully-rounds-floating-numbers-even-though-they-are-impreci

return result Round the same way Excel does. Dealing with nonsense such as nplaces 400 is an exercise left to the reader. double..