¡@
c++ Programming Glossary: schaubhttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/12192895/should-in-c11-stdvectorresizesize-type-work-for-the-default-constructi Args ... which is valid for array types as @Johannes Schaub litb points out array types can be initialised with zero pack..
Is it possible to invoke a user-defined conversion function via list-initialization? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12677711/is-it-possible-to-invoke-a-user-defined-conversion-function-via-list-initializat gone through all that I've found a discussion by Johannes Schaub that confirms this analysis This is intended to factor out the..
What is the difference between a definition and a declaration? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1410563/what-is-the-difference-between-a-definition-and-a-declaration forms of class declarations in C . Thanks to litb Johannes Schaub who dug out the actual chapter and verse in one of his answers...
Does initialization entail lvalue-to-rvalue conversion? Is `int x = x;` UB? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14935722/does-initialization-entail-lvalue-to-rvalue-conversion-is-int-x-x-ub evidence is found in 4 8 as pointed out by Johannes Schaub in the comments to linked Q A There are some contexts where..
A positive lambda: '+[]{}' - What sorcery is this? [duplicate] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18889028/a-positive-lambda-what-sorcery-is-this was answered and all seemed fine. Then came Johannes Schaub and made an interesting observation If you put a before the..
what is/are the purpose(s) of inline? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3647053/what-is-are-the-purposes-of-inline the purpose s of inline I had a discussion with Johannes Schaub regarding the keyword inline . The code there was this namespace..
Use of typename keyword with typedef and new http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4421306/use-of-typename-keyword-with-typedef-and-new and new EDIT after reading this response from Johannes Schaub typedef NOT followed by a type int typedef A This syntax asks..
Why 'this' is a pointer and not a reference? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/645994/why-this-is-a-pointer-and-not-a-reference const pointer after array to pointer conversion Johannes Schaub litb Dec 22 '08 at 1 56 That only shows that it doesn't use.. T const . but the pointer itself is nonconst Johannes Schaub litb Dec 22 '08 at 17 53 think of this like this #define this.. is no such macro but it can help understand it Johannes Schaub litb Dec 22 '08 at 17 55 My question is why this is a pointer..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/712639/understanding-the-meaning-of-the-term-and-the-concept-raii-resource-acquisiti just a sample but turned out incorrect. Thanks Johannes Schaub for pointing out and FredOverflow for turning it into a correct..
Why can't variables defined in a conditional be constructed with arguments? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8332285/why-cant-variables-defined-in-a-conditional-be-constructed-with-arguments isn't really any motivation to do so now. As Johannes Schaub points out this change would break existing code so it's pretty..
|