¡@
python Programming Glossary: foometaPython metaclasses: Why isn't __setattr__ called for attributes set during class definition? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10762088/python-metaclasses-why-isnt-setattr-called-for-attributes-set-during-class class definition I have the following python code class FooMeta type def __setattr__ self name value print name value return.. __setattr__ self name value print name value return super FooMeta self .__setattr__ name value class Foo object __metaclass__.. .__setattr__ name value class Foo object __metaclass__ FooMeta FOO 123 def a self pass I would have expected __setattr__ of..
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6567724/matplotlib-so-log-axis-only-has-minor-tick-mark-labels-at-specified-points-also
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/681953/python-class-decorator Example def substitute_init self id args kwargs pass class FooMeta type def __new__ cls name bases attrs attrs '__init__' substitute_init.. bases attrs attrs '__init__' substitute_init return super FooMeta cls .__new__ cls name bases attrs class Foo object __metaclass__.. cls name bases attrs class Foo object __metaclass__ FooMeta def __init__ self value1 pass Replacing the constructor is perhaps..
|
